Tag Archives: spiritual life

Wise As The Wind

Uranus stations direct at the end of Pisces. What does that give us? Lightning bolts shooting out of the fog. Like a haunted cloud. Dangerous and potentially deceptive. In the end, illuminating. Emily offers the following:

#417, c. 1862

It is dead — find it —
Out of sound — Out of sight —
“Happy”? Which is wiser —
You, or the Wind?
“Conscious”? Won’t you ask that —
Of the low Ground?

“Homesick”? Many met it —
Even through them — This
Cannot testify —
Themself — as dumb —

Something has died, a thing beyond her grasp. She was not able to resuscitate it. What ever this “it” is. The question in these lines that lingers in my thoughts is “Which is wiser — / You, or the Wind?” All these words “happy”, “conscious”, “homesick”, are conditions of human life. The poet wants to know, “So what?” It is dead, and if it is dead, then so what?

She scares me sometimes when she does this. She renounces common grammar along with ordinary human attachments. You know the ones I mean. The hunger we have for meaning, for the happy ending where it all comes out right and proper.

Instead Emily bores down into the words to a level so unadorned that she rids them of any influence or prejudice. Sentence structure always has an ulterior motive. Some yearning or unseen agenda. She is trying to boil the language clean of all that. To set the words on the page with the same direct purity as the wind blowing across the hillside.

She’s doing this, I fear again, because there is something in Emily that dreads being human. That seeks an utterly unadorned existence. Why? Partly she is driven by her own neurotic curiosity. She needs to see what it’s like. And because she can. Sheer talent drives her. She has to explore the extent of her own power and courage to descend into purity of expression. If nothing else, for the sake of finding the outer boundary of her own genius. Because it’s there.

Also she dreads and sheds these adornments because they are too sweet for her. The pain of losing this sweetness is unbearable. The shadow side of her genius.

Grammar makes suffering of us all.

So who is wiser? You or the wind? Who would you rather be? Your self with all your sticky, stinky assumptions? The creases that hold decaying matter that rots your soul as surely as the teeth drop from your head? Or would you rather slip across the page like the wind? Like air moving in a smooth, unending stream that catches nothing in its way because it is as no thing itself? Which of these possibilities seems the wiser? She poses the question as if we had a choice. To be wise as the wind. Or remain as foolish as we are born.

Oddly or maybe not, the wind this morning is bringing down all the red leaves from my crepe myrtle tree. The flowers are long dead. We move toward the winter solstice, burrowing into the dark. Who says we don’t have a real fall here in New Orleans?

Leave a comment

Filed under Emily Every Day

Drunk on Joy

I might have to start calling this the “Emily Every Other Day” project.  Sorry, I missed a day.  Some mornings I just can’t get to it.  The morning runs away. Or the poem I choose confounds me so that my pen doesn’t want to move.  I know the page is there, humming on my hard drive, asking for my attention.

So today, you get two for the price of one because I was remiss yesterday.  Interestingly, the two poems from yesterday and today, seem linked or progressed, even though I selected each of them completely at random.

The theme for these two days is fantasy or self-deception.  For it?  Against it?  Me, I’m for it.  I think Emily is too.  Not without caution and some humor, but also a real appreciation for the benefits of dallying in Pretend Land.

The first is #981, c. 1864

As Sleigh Bells seem in summer
Or Bees, at Christmas show—
So fairy — so fictitious
The individuals do
Repealed from observation —
A Party that we knew —
More distant in an instant
Than Dawn in Timbuctoo.

Emily is playful.  I love it when she does that.  “Sleigh Bells in Summer or Bees at Christmas.”  These are absurd possibilities.  Just as absurd as her belief in a close relationship to “A Party that we knew.” Then after lightly teasing herself, she twists the knife in her own heart.  The bloody tine in the midst of the jokey play.  Not at the end.  She won’t end with that hard phrase, “More distant in an instant.”  Instead she ends with “Dawn in Timbuctoo”, which I read as light, again.  It’s the line before that gets to me.

“More distant in an Instant” is the moment of fantasy crashing into a brick wall.  Someone she believes she was close to her is, in an instant, not there.  Some rupture has occurred.  Now she calls it fiction.  She questions her own grip on what just happened.  This is the bewilderment that inevitably arises when one person shares space with another.  Each is a foreign country to the other.  The two will never share the same language or story.  Em says it must all have been a fiction.  If that bond breaks so quickly, how could it ever have been real?

She has sport with herself and this fictionalizing.  But I hear that tine of pain.  The shock!  She can’t help it.  Before the sober, sensible adult self steps in to explain things and make light jokes, first the child self has to experience the shock of pain.  Oh, I thought that was mine.  I thought that was really mine.  Where did it go?

That “more distant in an instant” is the bewildering pained space in which the believer has to rearrange her sense of what’s real.  She’ll do it because she can and because she has to.  But for that instant she is the bereft and bewildered child, in pain and longing for that delightful, counter-rational fiction.

The next poem that leaped into my hand embraces fantasy and holds it up as the thing that makes everything worthwhile.

#1118, c. 1868

Exhilaration is the Breeze
That Lifts us from the Ground
And leaves us in another place
Whose statement is not found —
Returns us not, but after time
We soberly descend
A little newer for the term
Upon Enchanted Ground —

Here Emily adds another layer to the fantasy.  That is pure joy.  It’s clear that this joy is an unreality.  But now she lands squarely in defense of La La Land, as the thing necessary for a sense of renewal.

Being joyful is like a nice two-day drunk, after which “we soberly descend.”  When we return from joy to sobriety, we do not experience a loss of joy but a chance to bring some of that drunken enlightenment forward into the rest of the grounded sober life.

We can’t stay drunk forever.  Can’t loft in those breezes indefinitely.  She’s pretty clear that “other place” won’t support us.  We must descend on our own.  Joy doesn’t kick us out.  We return on our own because we must.  But our visit to the idealized realm of joy changes us and makes us better.  Why? We get to see things when we are up in the clouds that we can’t see on the ground.  Certainly joy expands our vision.  It’s a crazy drunk sort of vision that relieves another kind of unreality brought on by a refusal of joy.

Taken as a pair, these two poems show a wonderful movement from pained self-recrimination—something along the lines of  this: “How could I be so childish as to believe something I invented?”  To a triumph of self-acceptance along the lines of this: “How could I not be so child-like!  How could I not invent reasons to run and jump for joy?!”  My ability to experience something I have invented as if it were real is my greatest gift.  It makes me better and better.

Go Emily.

I am influenced perhaps by my reading of Jack Kerouac last night.  In his list titled, “Belief and Technique for Modern Prose” he suggests to writers:  “Try never get drunk outside yr own house.”  Good advice that.

In the end, Emily and I agree that it is not always easy being the sort of person who can invent things with her mind.  Such a talent always leaves a girl vulnerable to feeling foolish.  However, the alternative is far worse.

I plan never to grow up.

Leave a comment

Filed under Emily Every Day

Emily Every Day

Good morning.  This should keep me busy for a while.  I am reading The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson, edited by Thomas H. Johnson.  The latest copyright printed on the inside flap of my copy is 1960.  The price: $6.95.  The introduction tells me this edition relies heavily on the 1955 variorum text of The Poems of Emily Dickinson published by Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (in three volumes!!).  That consisted of 1775 poems.  Emily’s capricious Capitalizations and highly intentional dashes are therein preserved.  

I relay all this information as a form of throat clearing.  You  may ignore it if you like.  The important information follows:  This edition has been gathering dust on my shelf for many years, probably since my undergraduate days at Smith.  Now I read one of Emily’s poems each morning as a meditative and creative practice.  I read the poem aloud, close my eyes and let it dissolve on my tongue like a lozenge.  Then I write whatever comes.

The first poem in this edition is a “valentine” dated 1850.  She was young, a teenager.  It is a conventional verse, exploring conventional sentiments of love.  “Oh, the Earth was made for lovers . . .” she says.  Then she goes on to explain how many things come in pairs.  Heaven and Earth, Wave and Shore.  Each needs the other to exist.  Only God is single.  Interesting thought that.  The force that creates and governs all is the only undivided substance.  All the rest, not only us humans, but everything according to Em is split into two parts that yearn for each other.  That all things on the physical and psychic plane reflect our desire for a mate.

Then she ends with an exhortation to some unnamed person, presumably male, to give up his cold solitude.  Emily instructs him to climb a tree where six girls—she names them—sit waiting to be plucked like ripe fruit.  He is to take the one he loves (what of the other five I ask!) and bring her to the “greenwood, and build for her a bower”.  He is also supposed to give her whatever she wants whether, “jewel, or bird, or flower—”.  She also instructs him to “beat upon the drum—”

Then it appears he is to honor and cherish her until she faints from exhaustion.

Emily, you minx.

As I read this, some loud-mouth bird sits on the wire overhead and sings his chest out, calling to his mate, berating her for failing to notice his magnificence.  What a racket.  He sings ever stronger and louder so she will come to him.

It’s quiet now.  The poem done.  The singing too.

1 Comment

Filed under Emily Every Day